healthcare benchmark
HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AN | 66.0% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 2 | OP | 60.5% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 3 | AN | 59.8% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 4 | AN | 57.8% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 5 | OP | 57.7% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 6 | AN | 55.8% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 7 | OP | 55.7% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 8 | OP | 38.4% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 9 | MI | 35.0% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about HealthBench Professional.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 66.0%.
HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.