reasoning benchmark
A comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate image-context reasoning in large visual-language models (LVLMs) by challenging models with 346 images and 1,129 carefully crafted questions to assess language hallucination and visual illusion
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 70.0% | 100.0% | 16 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 69.8% | 93.3% | 16 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 67.9% | 86.7% | 16 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 67.6% | 80.0% | 16 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 67.4% | 73.3% | 16 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 66.7% | 66.7% | 16 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 66.0% | 60.0% | 16 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 65.4% | 53.3% | 16 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 64.1% | 46.7% | 16 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 63.8% | 40.0% | 16 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 63.2% | 33.3% | 16 | C | |
| 12 | AC | 61.5% | 26.7% | 16 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 61.1% | 20.0% | 16 | C | |
| 14 | AC | 57.6% | 13.3% | 16 | C | |
| 15 | AC | 55.2% | 6.7% | 16 | C | |
| 16 | AC | 52.9% | 0.0% | 16 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate image-context reasoning in large visual-language models (LVLMs) by challenging models with 346 images and 1,129 carefully crafted questions to assess language hallucination and visual illusion
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Hallusion Bench.
Qwen3.5-27B is currently ranked first with 70.0%.
A comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate image-context reasoning in large visual-language models (LVLMs) by challenging models with 346 images and 1,129 carefully crafted questions to assess language hallucination and visual illusion
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
16 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.