reasoning benchmark
GeneBench is an evaluation focused on multi-stage scientific data analysis in genetics and quantitative biology. Tasks require reasoning about ambiguous or noisy data with minimal supervisory guidance, addressing realistic obstacles such as hidden confounders or QC failures, and correctly implementing and interpreting modern statistical methods.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | OP | 33.2% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | OP | 25.0% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
GeneBench is an evaluation focused on multi-stage scientific data analysis in genetics and quantitative biology. Tasks require reasoning about ambiguous or noisy data with minimal supervisory guidance, addressing realistic obstacles such as hidden confounders or QC failures, and correctly implementing and interpreting modern statistical methods.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about GeneBench.
GPT-5.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 33.2%.
GeneBench is an evaluation focused on multi-stage scientific data analysis in genetics and quantitative biology. Tasks require reasoning about ambiguous or noisy data with minimal supervisory guidance, addressing realistic obstacles such as hidden confounders or QC failures, and correctly implementing and interpreting modern statistical methods.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.