multimodal benchmark
GameWorld
GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models2
Registry coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB
GameWorld leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | BY | 31.2% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | BY | 25.9% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Score distribution
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
GameWorld highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is GameWorld?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- GameWorld
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- gameworld|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about GameWorld.
Which model scores highest on GameWorld?
Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 31.2%.
What does GameWorld measure?
GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.