math benchmark
A functional variant of the MATH benchmark that tests language models' ability to generalize reasoning patterns across different problem instances, revealing the reasoning gap between static and functional performance.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 64.6% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 53.6% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A functional variant of the MATH benchmark that tests language models' ability to generalize reasoning patterns across different problem instances, revealing the reasoning gap between static and functional performance.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about FunctionalMATH.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 64.6%.
A functional variant of the MATH benchmark that tests language models' ability to generalize reasoning patterns across different problem instances, revealing the reasoning gap between static and functional performance.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.