reasoning benchmark
FrontierScience Research is a benchmark evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | ME | 38.3% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 2 | BY | 33.3% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 3 | BY | 28.3% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 4 | TE | 21.3% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
FrontierScience Research is a benchmark evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about FrontierScience Research.
Muse Spark is currently ranked first with 38.3%.
FrontierScience Research is a benchmark evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.