agents benchmark
FrontierSWE (Impl.)
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models1
Registry coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
FrontierSWE (Impl.) leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | XI | 340.0% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
FrontierSWE (Impl.) highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- FrontierSWE (Impl.)
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- agents
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- frontier-swe-impl|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about FrontierSWE (Impl.).
Which model scores highest on FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 340.0%.
What does FrontierSWE (Impl.) measure?
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.