llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksreasoningFRAMES

reasoning benchmark

FRAMES

Factuality, Retrieval, And reasoning MEasurement Set - a unified evaluation dataset of 824 challenging multi-hop questions for testing retrieval-augmented generation systems across factuality, retrieval accuracy, and reasoning capabilities, requiring integration of 2-15 Wikipedia articles per question

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models2
Registry coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

FRAMES leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

1MAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AI87.0%100.0%2CAug 7, 2026
2DEDeepSeek-V3DeepSeek73.3%0.0%2CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

FRAMES

FRAMES highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1Kimi K2-Thinking-090587.0%Rank #2DeepSeek-V373.3%

What is FRAMES?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

Factuality, Retrieval, And reasoning MEasurement Set - a unified evaluation dataset of 824 challenging multi-hop questions for testing retrieval-augmented generation systems across factuality, retrieval accuracy, and reasoning capabilities, requiring integration of 2-15 Wikipedia articles per question

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
FRAMES
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
frames|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about FRAMES.

Which model scores highest on FRAMES?

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is currently ranked first with 87.0%.

What does FRAMES measure?

Factuality, Retrieval, And reasoning MEasurement Set - a unified evaluation dataset of 824 challenging multi-hop questions for testing retrieval-augmented generation systems across factuality, retrieval accuracy, and reasoning capabilities, requiring integration of 2-15 Wikipedia articles per question

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai