reasoning benchmark
Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 97.9% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 97.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about FlenQA.
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is currently ranked first with 97.9%.
Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.