llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksreasoningFlenQA

reasoning benchmark

FlenQA

Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models2
Registry coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

FlenQA leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

1MIPhi 4 Reasoning PlusMicrosoft97.9%100.0%2CAug 7, 2026
2MIPhi 4 ReasoningMicrosoft97.7%0.0%2CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

FlenQA

FlenQA highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1Phi 4 Reasoning Plus97.9%Rank #2Phi 4 Reasoning97.7%

What is FlenQA?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
FlenQA
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
flenqa|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about FlenQA.

Which model scores highest on FlenQA?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is currently ranked first with 97.9%.

What does FlenQA measure?

Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai