reasoning benchmark
A fine-grained atomic evaluation metric for factual precision in long-form text generation that breaks generated text into atomic facts and computes the percentage supported by reliable knowledge sources, with automated assessment using retrieval and language models
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | XA | 97.0% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | OP | 1.0% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A fine-grained atomic evaluation metric for factual precision in long-form text generation that breaks generated text into atomic facts and computes the percentage supported by reliable knowledge sources, with automated assessment using retrieval and language models
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about FActScore.
Grok-4.1 is currently ranked first with 97.0%.
A fine-grained atomic evaluation metric for factual precision in long-form text generation that breaks generated text into atomic facts and computes the percentage supported by reliable knowledge sources, with automated assessment using retrieval and language models
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.