safety benchmark
ExploitBench is a cybersecurity benchmark that evaluates a model's ability to discover and exploit software vulnerabilities, reported as the fraction of challenges where the model captures the target (Cap%).
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AN | 78.0% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 2 | OP | 73.5% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 3 | OP | 52.9% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 4 | OP | 33.2% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
ExploitBench is a cybersecurity benchmark that evaluates a model's ability to discover and exploit software vulnerabilities, reported as the fraction of challenges where the model captures the target (Cap%).
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about ExploitBench.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 78.0%.
ExploitBench is a cybersecurity benchmark that evaluates a model's ability to discover and exploit software vulnerabilities, reported as the fraction of challenges where the model captures the target (Cap%).
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.