reasoning benchmark
DeepSearchQA is a benchmark for evaluating deep search and question-answering capabilities, testing models' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and information retrieval across complex knowledge domains.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 95.0% | 100.0% | 8 | C | |
| 2 | AN | 93.1% | 85.7% | 8 | C | |
| 3 | AN | 91.3% | 71.4% | 8 | C | |
| 4 | TE | 91.0% | 57.1% | 8 | C | |
| 5 | XI | 86.7% | 42.9% | 8 | C | |
| 6 | MA | 83.0% | 28.6% | 8 | C | |
| 7 | MA | 77.1% | 14.3% | 8 | C | |
| 8 | ME | 74.8% | 0.0% | 8 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
DeepSearchQA is a benchmark for evaluating deep search and question-answering capabilities, testing models' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and information retrieval across complex knowledge domains.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about DeepSearchQA.
Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 95.0%.
DeepSearchQA is a benchmark for evaluating deep search and question-answering capabilities, testing models' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and information retrieval across complex knowledge domains.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.