reasoning benchmark
CRUXEval-O (output prediction) with Chain-of-Thought prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark consisting of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities. The output prediction task requires models to predict the output of a given Python function with specific inputs, evaluated using chain-of-thought reasoning methodology.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 56.0% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
CRUXEval-O (output prediction) with Chain-of-Thought prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark consisting of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities. The output prediction task requires models to predict the output of a given Python function with specific inputs, evaluated using chain-of-thought reasoning methodology.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about CRUXEval-Output-CoT.
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is currently ranked first with 56.0%.
CRUXEval-O (output prediction) with Chain-of-Thought prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark consisting of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities. The output prediction task requires models to predict the output of a given Python function with specific inputs, evaluated using chain-of-thought reasoning methodology.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.