reasoning benchmark
CRAG (Comprehensive RAG Benchmark) is a factual question answering benchmark consisting of 4,409 question-answer pairs across 5 domains (finance, sports, music, movie, open domain) and 8 question categories. The benchmark includes mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph search, designed to represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world QA tasks with temporal dynamism ranging from years to seconds. It evaluates retrieval-augmented generation systems for trustworthy question answering.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AM | 50.3% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | AM | 43.8% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | AM | 43.1% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
CRAG (Comprehensive RAG Benchmark) is a factual question answering benchmark consisting of 4,409 question-answer pairs across 5 domains (finance, sports, music, movie, open domain) and 8 question categories. The benchmark includes mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph search, designed to represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world QA tasks with temporal dynamism ranging from years to seconds. It evaluates retrieval-augmented generation systems for trustworthy question answering.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about CRAG.
Nova Pro is currently ranked first with 50.3%.
CRAG (Comprehensive RAG Benchmark) is a factual question answering benchmark consisting of 4,409 question-answer pairs across 5 domains (finance, sports, music, movie, open domain) and 8 question categories. The benchmark includes mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph search, designed to represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world QA tasks with temporal dynamism ranging from years to seconds. It evaluates retrieval-augmented generation systems for trustworthy question answering.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.