physics benchmark
CMT-Benchmark
CMT-Benchmark evaluates models on condensed matter theory problems, testing advanced physics reasoning across areas such as many-body systems, quantum field theory, and statistical mechanics.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
CMT-Benchmark Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 1 | TE | 37.9% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
CMT-Benchmark Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is CMT-Benchmark?
What CMT-Benchmark measures and how its scores work.
CMT-Benchmark evaluates models on condensed matter theory problems, testing advanced physics reasoning across areas such as many-body systems, quantum field theory, and statistical mechanics.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- CMT-Benchmark
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- physics
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- cmt-benchmark|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about CMT-Benchmark.
Which model scores highest on CMT-Benchmark?
Hy3 is currently ranked first with 37.9%.
What does CMT-Benchmark measure?
CMT-Benchmark evaluates models on condensed matter theory problems, testing advanced physics reasoning across areas such as many-body systems, quantum field theory, and statistical mechanics.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.