multimodal benchmark
ChartQA
ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models24
Registry coverage24
MetricScore
EvidenceB
ChartQA leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
Score distribution
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
ChartQA highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is ChartQA?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- ChartQA
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- chartqa|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about ChartQA.
Which model scores highest on ChartQA?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is currently ranked first with 90.8%.
What does ChartQA measure?
ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
24 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.