reasoning benchmark
C-Eval is a comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. It comprises 13,948 multiple-choice questions across 52 diverse disciplines spanning humanities, science, and engineering, with four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. The benchmark includes C-Eval Hard, a subset of very challenging subjects requiring advanced reasoning abilities.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 93.3% | 100.0% | 18 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 93.0% | 94.1% | 18 | C | |
| 3 | MA | 92.5% | 88.2% | 18 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 91.9% | 82.3% | 18 | C | |
| 5 | XI | 91.5% | 76.5% | 18 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 91.4% | 70.6% | 18 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 90.5% | 64.7% | 18 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 90.2% | 58.8% | 18 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 90.0% | 52.9% | 18 | C | |
| 10 | MA | 88.3% | 47.1% | 18 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 88.2% | 41.2% | 18 | C | |
| 12 | DE | 86.5% | 35.3% | 18 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 85.1% | 29.4% | 18 | C | |
| 14 | AC | 83.8% | 23.5% | 18 | C | |
| 15 | AC | 77.2% | 17.6% | 18 | C | |
| 16 | AC | 73.2% | 11.8% | 18 | C | |
| 17 | AC | 50.5% | 5.9% | 18 | C | |
| 18 | BA | 40.7% | 0.0% | 18 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
C-Eval is a comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. It comprises 13,948 multiple-choice questions across 52 diverse disciplines spanning humanities, science, and engineering, with four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. The benchmark includes C-Eval Hard, a subset of very challenging subjects requiring advanced reasoning abilities.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about C-Eval.
Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 93.3%.
C-Eval is a comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. It comprises 13,948 multiple-choice questions across 52 diverse disciplines spanning humanities, science, and engineering, with four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. The benchmark includes C-Eval Hard, a subset of very challenging subjects requiring advanced reasoning abilities.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
18 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.