reasoning benchmark
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | ME | 77.3% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 2 | NV | 74.1% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 3 | NV | 73.7% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 4 | ME | 67.0% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 5 | NV | 63.6% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about BFCL v2.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 77.3%.
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.