frontend development benchmark
Artifacts Bench evaluates a model's ability to generate visual code artifacts, measuring the quality of generated interactive and visual front-end outputs from natural-language requests.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | BY | 51.0% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | BY | 47.0% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | MI | 36.4% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Artifacts Bench evaluates a model's ability to generate visual code artifacts, measuring the quality of generated interactive and visual front-end outputs from natural-language requests.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Artifacts Bench.
Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 51.0%.
Artifacts Bench evaluates a model's ability to generate visual code artifacts, measuring the quality of generated interactive and visual front-end outputs from natural-language requests.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.