multimodal benchmark
Android Control Low_EM
Android control benchmark evaluating autonomous agents on mobile device interaction tasks with low exact match scoring criteria
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB
Android Control Low_EM Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 1 | AC | 93.7% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 93.3% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 91.4% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Android Control Low_EM Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
Android Control Low_EM Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is Android Control Low_EM?
What Android Control Low_EM measures and how its scores work.
Android control benchmark evaluating autonomous agents on mobile device interaction tasks with low exact match scoring criteria
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- Android Control Low_EM
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- android-control-low-em|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about Android Control Low_EM.
Which model scores highest on Android Control Low_EM?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 93.7%.
What does Android Control Low_EM measure?
Android control benchmark evaluating autonomous agents on mobile device interaction tasks with low exact match scoring criteria
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
3 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.