llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarkssafetyAIR-Bench

safety benchmark

AIR-Bench

AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models1
Registry coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

AIR-Bench leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

1MIMAI-Thinking-1Microsoft88.0%100.0%1CAug 7, 2026

AIR-Bench highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1MAI-Thinking-188.0%

What is AIR-Bench?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
AIR-Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
safety
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
air-bench|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about AIR-Bench.

Which model scores highest on AIR-Bench?

MAI-Thinking-1 is currently ranked first with 88.0%.

What does AIR-Bench measure?

AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai