safety benchmark
AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 88.0% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about AIR-Bench.
MAI-Thinking-1 is currently ranked first with 88.0%.
AIR-Bench 2024 is a safety benchmark grounded in risk categories derived from government regulations and company policies. It evaluates policy-grounded refusal across a broad regulatory and policy-derived harm taxonomy, using category-specific LLM-judge prompts that reward safe engagement rather than only penalizing unsafe responses.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.