reasoning benchmark
AdvancedIF is a rubric-based benchmark measuring complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instruction following ability, scored with a calibrated LLM judge against per-instruction rubrics.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 85.0% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 71.4% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
AdvancedIF is a rubric-based benchmark measuring complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instruction following ability, scored with a calibrated LLM judge against per-instruction rubrics.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about AdvancedIF.
MAI-Thinking-1 is currently ranked first with 85.0%.
AdvancedIF is a rubric-based benchmark measuring complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instruction following ability, scored with a calibrated LLM judge against per-instruction rubrics.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.